Big whales eat 3 times as much as previously thought, which means killing them for food and blubber is even more harmful to the environment - Yahoo News

Researchers near Antarctica interact with humpback whales. Duke University Marine Robotics and Remote Sensing under NOAA permit 1 4809 - 03 and ACA permits 2015 - 011 and 2020 - 016

• Marine ecosystems were thrown out off-kilter by the mass hunting of big whales.

• Whales' krill consumption keeps ecosystems in balance, and a study found they eat more than thought.

• The finding means that each whale is even more important than people realized.

Scientists have found that large whales eat at least three times as much as previously thought, a discovery which highlights their importance in keeping the oceans healthy.

The study, published Wednesday in the peer-reviewed journal Nature, provides clues as to why wiping out millions of the largest whales was so devastating to marine environments.

Reestablishing the whale population could do wonders for marine environments and might even help replenish dwindling fish populations, two scientists told Insider.

A humpback whale eating in the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary. Elliott Hazen

The krill paradox

From 1900 to 1970, industrial whaling wiped out about 1.5 million larges whales around Antarctica.

"The largest whale species on the planet were systematically hunted, which reduced abundances probably greater than 70% in many cases," Nicholas Pyenson, an author on the study and curator of fossil marine mammals at the Smithsonian Institution, told Insider.

"Ninety-nine percent of the blue whales that were alive in 1900 were gone by 1960," he said.

Scientists in the '70s had assumed that without the whales to prey on them, populations of krill and fish would explode and other predators would thrive as they filled the gap in the food chain.

But that's not what happened. The ecosystem never bounced back.

"In actuality, there was an incredible decline over the following 50 years - and it's still happening today," Matthew Savoca, the lead author on the study and a postdoctoral scholar at Stanford's Hopkins Marine Station, said, referring to krill.

"The steepest declines in krill biomass have been seen in areas where the most whales were killed," he told Insider.

The "krill paradox" had left scientists puzzled.

A humpback whale feeds at the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary. Elliott Hazen

Whales turn over a lot more food than previously thought

Up until recently, it was extremely difficult to get a sense of how large whales fed. They can't be kept in captivity, and they feed deep under the surface of the water.

The scientists running the study developed sensors that could detect fish and krill as the whales ate them.

These sensors, which are stuck on the whales with suction cups seen in the video below, were used to track 321 baleen whales from seven species in the Southern Ocean, which surrounds Antarctica.

Using this tech, the scientists found the whales ate three or more times the amount previously thought.

That means that pre-whaling populations in the Southern Ocean alone would have eaten about 400 million metric tons of krill a year, far more than had been assumed.

That's also twice as much as the total amount of krill left in Antarctica today.

Researchers approach a blue whale to attach a suction-cup tag. Elliott Hazen under NOAA/NMFS permit 16111

That means whales produce a lot more of their iron-rich poop than previously believed, a fact that explains the severity of environmental damage when they were killed.

"We believe these whales are acting as key nutrient recyclers in this ecosystem," Savoca said.

As the whales feed and defecate, they redistribute the iron toward the surface of the ocean. That makes the iron available for phytoplankton, small algae that can't grow without the nutrient.

These, in turn, are eaten by krill, which are eaten by the whales.

Without the whales, a large proportion of this iron falls toward the bottom of the ocean, effectively leaving the ecosystem.

Because the whales seem to be such a pivotal actor in the ecosystem, reestablishing the whale population in the Southern Ocean and other oceans would be beneficial to the marine environments, Pyenson and Savoca said.

"You'd see more krill, more whales. You would probably also see, as a consequence of a healthier ecosystem, is greater fish yields. Penguin populations might rebound. There are all kinds of downstream consequences," Pyenson said.

Whaling today "doesn't have really that much of an impact on the world's whale populations," he said, because its scale is very small compared with the past.

But far more whales - hundreds of thousands - are killed accidentally by humans, either by getting hit by ships or by getting stuck in fishing gear, Pyenson said.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Adblock test (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Big whales eat 3 times as much as previously thought, which means killing them for food and blubber is even more harmful to the environment - Yahoo News )
https://ift.tt/3wmMefO
Science